Rulebook · Plan check
Amount possibly not clear
Section F provision should normally be quantified: its type, hours and frequency, and the level of expertise.
What a point from this check says, with placeholders in square brackets:
[what was found]
- Where it looks
- Section F: Special educational provision
- How it is reported
- Code says shouldThe SEND Code of Practice says "should" here. The bodies it applies to (such as councils, schools, colleges and health bodies) must have regard to it, and the Code says they will be expected to explain any departure from it.
- Type of rule
- Code of Practice: should (follow unless there is a good reason not to)
- How Plenda finds it
- From the wording of the plan. Found by matching words, so a person should check it.
- The requirement
- See the requirement and every check that looks for it
- Rule id
chk.f.hedged_amount- Rules version
- england-2026.10
- Law as at
- 30 September 2026
Sources
- SEND Code of Practice 2015, Section F row (normally quantified), para 9.69Code of Practice: should (follow unless there is a good reason not to)
Plan checks look at what a plan says and how clearly. They do not judge whether the help is enough for the child.
If you think this rule is wrong or out of date, please tell us. A person reads every report.