Rulebook · Plan check
Named only generically
Section F provision should normally be quantified: its type, hours and frequency, and the level of expertise.
What a point from this check says, with placeholders in square brackets:
The text supplied gives this only in general terms: [what was found]. Naming the role or the training would make it clearer.
- Where it looks
- Section F: Special educational provision
- How it is reported
- Could be clearerGood practice that makes the plan easier to follow and check. Not a legal requirement.
- Type of rule
- Good practice
- How Plenda finds it
- From the wording of the plan. Found by matching words, so a person should check it.
- What would address it
- Name the role and the training or expertise needed.
- The requirement
- See the requirement and every check that looks for it
- Rule id
chk.f.named_generically- Rules version
- england-2026.10
- Law as at
- 30 September 2026
Sources
- SEND Code of Practice 2015, Section F row (normally quantified), para 9.69Code of Practice: should (follow unless there is a good reason not to)
Plan checks look at what a plan says and how clearly. They do not judge whether the help is enough for the child.
If you think this rule is wrong or out of date, please tell us. A person reads every report.