Rulebook · Plan check

Possibly not specific enough

Section G sets out the health care provision reasonably required by the learning difficulties and disabilities that result in special educational needs, and it should be detailed and specific.

What a point from this check says, with placeholders in square brackets:

[what was found]

Where it looks

• Section G: Health care provision
• Section H1: Social care provision under section 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970
• Section H2: Other social care provision

How it is reported

Code says shouldThe SEND Code of Practice says "should" here. The bodies it applies to (such as councils, schools, colleges and health bodies) must have regard to it, and the Code says they will be expected to explain any departure from it.

Type of rule

Code of Practice: should (follow unless there is a good reason not to)

How Plenda finds it

From the wording of the plan. Found by matching words, so a person should check it.

The requirement

See the requirement and every check that looks for it

Rule id

chk.gh.hedged

Rules version

england-2026.10

Law as at

30 September 2026

Sources

• SEND Regulations 2014, reg 12(1)(g)Law (Act or Regulations)
• SEND Code of Practice 2015, Section G row, para 9.69Code of Practice: should (follow unless there is a good reason not to)

Plan checks look at what a plan says and how clearly. They do not judge whether the help is enough for the child.

All plan checks